1980 Holden Commodore vs. 1998 Rover 400

To start off, 1998 Rover 400 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (111 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.

Because 1980 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Rover 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (231 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Holden Commodore 1998 Rover 400
Make Holden Rover
Model Commodore 400
Year Released 1980 1998
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3298 cc 1589 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 111 HP 109 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 231 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 4370 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2560 mm