1980 Holden Commodore vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 5,042 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Commodore (352 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 1980 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. 1980 Holden Commodore has automatic transmission and 2001 Jeep Wrangler has manual transmission. 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1980 Holden Commodore will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Commodore | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Commodore | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5042 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 352 Nm | 190 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2380 mm |