1980 Holden Commodore vs. 2001 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2001 Skoda Fabia is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,142 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Holden Commodore (134 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2001 Skoda Fabia. (128 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2001 Skoda Fabia.
Because 1980 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Skoda Fabia (310 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Commodore. (269 Nm). This means 2001 Skoda Fabia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Commodore | 2001 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Holden | Skoda |
Model | Commodore | Fabia |
Year Released | 1980 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4142 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 269 Nm | 310 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2470 mm |