1980 Holden Commodore vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 32 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (111 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Because 2004 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Holden Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1980 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 1980 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Commodore | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Holden | Ford |
Model | Commodore | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3298 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 111 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2490 mm |