1980 Holden Commodore vs. 2004 Mitsubishi eK

To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Commodore weights approximately 470 kg more than 2004 Mitsubishi eK.

Because 1980 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Mitsubishi eK has automatic transmission and 1980 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 1980 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Mitsubishi eK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Holden Commodore 2004 Mitsubishi eK
Make Holden Mitsubishi
Model Commodore eK
Year Released 1980 2004
Body Type Sedan Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3298 cc 657 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 111 HP 0 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1260 kg 790 kg
Vehicle Length 4710 mm 3400 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1480 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2350 mm