1980 Holden Commodore vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Commodore would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1980 Holden Commodore. (78 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Commodore. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1153 kg more than 1980 Holden Commodore. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (427 Nm) has 287 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Commodore. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Sequoia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Commodore | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | Commodore | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1890 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 78 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 140 Nm | 427 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4710 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 3100 mm |
