1980 Holden Gemini vs. 1964 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1980 Holden Gemini is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Holden Gemini is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Lotus Elan (100 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 1980 Holden Gemini. (67 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Gemini. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Gemini weights approximately 365 kg more than 1964 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Lotus Elan (138 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Gemini. (110 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1964 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Gemini.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Gemini | 1964 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Holden | Lotus |
Model | Gemini | Elan |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4240 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1580 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2140 mm |