1980 Holden Kingswood vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1980 Holden Kingswood is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Jeep CJ (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (89 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Kingswood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Kingswood weights approximately 190 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Holden Kingswood. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (221 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Kingswood.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Kingswood | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | Kingswood | CJ |
Year Released | 1980 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3298 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2060 mm |