1980 Holden Kingswood vs. 1963 Pontiac Tempest
To start off, 1980 Holden Kingswood is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Pontiac Tempest. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Pontiac Tempest would be higher. At 6,376 cc (8 cylinders), 1963 Pontiac Tempest is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Pontiac Tempest (295 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (89 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Pontiac Tempest should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Kingswood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Pontiac Tempest weights approximately 40 kg more than 1980 Holden Kingswood. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Holden Kingswood | 1963 Pontiac Tempest | |
Make | Holden | Pontiac |
Model | Kingswood | Tempest |
Year Released | 1980 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3298 cc | 6376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2930 mm |