1980 Holden Kingswood vs. 1993 Jaguar XJ220
To start off, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1993 Jaguar XJ220 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (542 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 453 more horse power than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (89 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Kingswood.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1993 Jaguar XJ220 (642 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 421 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (221 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 1993 Jaguar XJ220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Kingswood.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Kingswood | 1993 Jaguar XJ220 | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | Kingswood | XJ220 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3298 cc | 3498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 642 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 340 mm |
