1980 Holden Kingswood vs. 2002 Pagani Zonda
To start off, 2002 Pagani Zonda is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 7,300 cc (12 cylinders), 2002 Pagani Zonda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Pagani Zonda (547 HP) has 458 more horse power than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Pagani Zonda should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Kingswood. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Kingswood weights approximately 120 kg more than 2002 Pagani Zonda.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Pagani Zonda (750 Nm) has 529 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (221 Nm). This means 2002 Pagani Zonda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Kingswood.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Kingswood | 2002 Pagani Zonda | |
| Make | Holden | Pagani |
| Model | Kingswood | Zonda |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 3298 cc | 7300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 547 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 750 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4395 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2055 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1151 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2730 mm |
