1980 Holden Kingswood vs. 2007 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2007 Saturn Outlook is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Saturn Outlook (268 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1980 Holden Kingswood.
Because 1980 Holden Kingswood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Kingswood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Saturn Outlook (335 Nm) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Holden Kingswood. (221 Nm). This means 2007 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Holden Kingswood.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Kingswood | 2007 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Holden | Saturn |
| Model | Kingswood | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3298 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 268 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 335 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3030 mm |
