1980 Holden Kingswood vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Holden Kingswood. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Holden Kingswood would be higher. At 3,298 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Holden Kingswood is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Holden Kingswood weights approximately 385 kg more than 2008 Renault Clio.
Because 1980 Holden Kingswood is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Holden Kingswood. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Holden Kingswood (221 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Holden Kingswood will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Holden Kingswood | 2008 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Holden | Renault |
| Model | Kingswood | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 3298 cc | 1149 cc |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 105 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 985 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2480 mm |
