1980 Honda Prelude vs. 1996 Rover 220
To start off, 1996 Rover 220 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Honda Prelude. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Honda Prelude would be higher. At 1,993 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 220 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 220 weights approximately 294 kg more than 1980 Honda Prelude.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Honda Prelude | 1996 Rover 220 | |
Make | Honda | Rover |
Model | Prelude | 220 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1602 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 103 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 920 kg | 1214 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4100 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2330 mm | 2510 mm |