1980 Isuzu KB vs. 1986 Seat Ronda
To start off, 1986 Seat Ronda is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 1,584 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Isuzu KB is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Isuzu KB weights approximately 242 kg more than 1986 Seat Ronda.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Seat Ronda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Isuzu KB | 1986 Seat Ronda | |
| Make | Isuzu | Seat |
| Model | KB | Ronda |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1193 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 62 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 75 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 67.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4020 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2460 mm |
