1980 Isuzu KB vs. 2003 Mazda Roadster
To start off, 2003 Mazda Roadster is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 1,839 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda Roadster is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Isuzu KB weights approximately 82 kg more than 2003 Mazda Roadster.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Mazda Roadster. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Isuzu KB | 2003 Mazda Roadster | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | KB | Roadster |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1839 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 157 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1240 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 48 L |
