1980 Isuzu KB vs. 2004 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Renault Clio weights approximately 334 kg more than 1980 Isuzu KB.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Isuzu KB | 2004 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Isuzu | Renault |
| Model | KB | Clio |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 11.4:1 |
| Top Speed | 136 km/hour | 245 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 21.6 seconds | 5.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 1476 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 61 L |
