1980 Isuzu KB vs. 2008 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Toyota Celica is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Celica weights approximately 73 kg more than 1980 Isuzu KB.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Toyota Celica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Isuzu KB | 2008 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
Model | KB | Celica |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 11.5:1 |
Top Speed | 136 km/hour | 225 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 21.6 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 1215 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |