1980 Isuzu KB vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 1,598 cc, 2009 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda 3 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1980 Isuzu KB.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Isuzu KB | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | KB | 3 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 1598 cc |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 78 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 83.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 136 km/hour | 178 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 21.6 seconds | 12.8 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 1192 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 55 L |
