1980 Isuzu KB vs. 2012 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 576 kg more than 1980 Isuzu KB.
Because 1980 Isuzu KB is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Mazda CX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Isuzu KB will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Mazda CX-7 has automatic transmission and 1980 Isuzu KB has manual transmission. 1980 Isuzu KB will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Mazda CX-7 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Isuzu KB | 2012 Mazda CX-7 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | KB | CX-7 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 244 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 1718 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4681 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1646 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2751 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 69 L |
