1980 Isuzu KB vs. 2013 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XF is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Isuzu KB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Isuzu KB would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XF weights approximately 860 kg more than 1980 Isuzu KB.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Isuzu KB | 2013 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jaguar |
| Model | KB | XF |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1584 cc | 2995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 89 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 136 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 21.6 seconds | 7.9 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1142 kg | 2002 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4961 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2053 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2909 mm |
