1980 Italdesign Medusa vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot

To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Italdesign Medusa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Italdesign Medusa would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Patriot is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (172 HP) has 52 more horse power than 1980 Italdesign Medusa. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 1980 Italdesign Medusa.

Because 1980 Italdesign Medusa is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Italdesign Medusa. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1980 Italdesign Medusa 2009 Jeep Patriot
Make Italdesign Jeep
Model Medusa Patriot
Year Released 1980 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1995 cc 2360 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 120 HP 172 HP
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]