1980 Jaguar XJR vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1980 Jaguar XJR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 48 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Jaguar XJR | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Mazda |
| Model | XJR | RX-3 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5342 cc | 1964 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 852 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4090 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2320 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 65 L |
