1980 Jaguar XJR vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Jaguar XJR | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Jaguar | Ford |
Model | XJR | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5342 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2490 mm |