1980 Jaguar XJR vs. 2006 Holden UTE
To start off, 2006 Holden UTE is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Holden UTE weights approximately 600 kg more than 1980 Jaguar XJR.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Jaguar XJR | 2006 Holden UTE | |
Make | Jaguar | Holden |
Model | XJR | UTE |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 5342 cc | 3789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 204 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2950 mm |