1980 Jaguar XJR vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Jaguar XJR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Jaguar XJR would be higher. At 5,342 cc (12 cylinders), 1980 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo C70 weights approximately 851 kg more than 1980 Jaguar XJR.
Because 1980 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Jaguar XJR | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Jaguar | Volvo |
| Model | XJR | C70 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 5342 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 224 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1751 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2640 mm |
