1980 Kia Brisa vs. 1964 Volvo 120
To start off, 1980 Kia Brisa is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,778 cc (4 cylinders), 1964 Volvo 120 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Volvo 120 (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1980 Kia Brisa. (53 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Volvo 120 should accelerate faster than 1980 Kia Brisa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Volvo 120 weights approximately 220 kg more than 1980 Kia Brisa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 120 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Kia Brisa. (68 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 120 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Kia Brisa.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Kia Brisa | 1964 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Kia | Volvo |
Model | Brisa | 120 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 983 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 68 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 790 kg | 1010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2270 mm | 2610 mm |