1980 Lada 1200 vs. 1998 Lotus Emme
To start off, 1998 Lotus Emme is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 2,174 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Lotus Emme is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Lotus Emme (260 HP) has 201 more horse power than 1980 Lada 1200. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Lotus Emme should accelerate faster than 1980 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lada 1200 weights approximately 267 kg more than 1998 Lotus Emme.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Lotus Emme (354 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lada 1200. (85 Nm). This means 1998 Lotus Emme will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lada 1200 | 1998 Lotus Emme | |
Make | Lada | Lotus |
Model | 1200 | Emme |
Year Released | 1980 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1198 cc | 2174 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 260 HP |
Torque | 85 Nm | 354 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 678 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2770 mm |