1980 Lada 1200 vs. 2009 Lexus RX
To start off, 2009 Lexus RX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 3,439 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lexus RX (270 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 211 more horse power than 1980 Lada 1200. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1980 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lexus RX weights approximately 965 kg more than 1980 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Lexus RX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lada 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Lexus RX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Lexus RX (340 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lada 1200. (85 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Lexus RX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lada 1200. 2009 Lexus RX has automatic transmission and 1980 Lada 1200 has manual transmission. 1980 Lada 1200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Lexus RX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Lada 1200 | 2009 Lexus RX | |
| Make | Lada | Lexus |
| Model | 1200 | RX |
| Year Released | 1980 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1198 cc | 3439 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 340 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 87.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66 mm | 96 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 10.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 39 L | 73 L |
