1980 Lada Niva vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada Niva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada Niva would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (420 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 344 more horse power than 1980 Lada Niva. (76 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1980 Lada Niva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 601 kg more than 1980 Lada Niva. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Lada Niva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Lada Niva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro (569 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 459 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lada Niva. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2013 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lada Niva.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lada Niva | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Lada | Chevrolet |
Model | Niva | Camaro |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1452 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 76 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5900 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 569 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.7 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1751 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1377 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2852 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 72 L |