1980 Lada S vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada S would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lada S is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lada S weights approximately 15 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Because 1980 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lada S | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Lada | Renault |
Model | S | Clio |
Year Released | 1980 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2400 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |