1980 Lada S vs. 2012 Mazda 3
To start off, 2012 Mazda 3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lada S. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lada S would be higher. At 2,184 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1980 Lada S is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lada S. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lada S | 2012 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Lada | Mazda |
Model | S | 3 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1294 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4210 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 55 L |