1980 Lancia A 112 vs. 1979 Zastava 1500
To start off, 1980 Lancia A 112 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 1,479 cc (4 cylinders), 1979 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1979 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 385 kg more than 1980 Lancia A 112.
Because 1979 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia A 112 | 1979 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Lancia | Zastava |
Model | A 112 | 1500 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1979 |
Engine Size | 902 cc | 1479 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2430 mm |