1980 Lancia A 112 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1093 kg more than 1980 Lancia A 112.
Because 2011 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2011 Cadillac CTS has automatic transmission and 1980 Lancia A 112 has manual transmission. 1980 Lancia A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Cadillac CTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia A 112 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Lancia | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | CTS |
Year Released | 1980 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Size | 902 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 655 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3230 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2880 mm |