1980 Lancia Beta vs. 1968 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1980 Lancia Beta is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 1,498 cc, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lancia Beta (81 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lancia Beta should accelerate faster than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lancia Beta weights approximately 90 kg more than 1968 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Mitsubishi Colt (120 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lancia Beta. (108 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1968 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia Beta | 1968 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Lancia | Mitsubishi |
Model | Beta | Colt |
Year Released | 1980 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1498 cc |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 108 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1000 kg | 910 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2360 mm |