1980 Lancia Beta vs. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lancia Beta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lancia Beta would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Mountaineer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (239 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1980 Lancia Beta. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 1980 Lancia Beta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Mountaineer weights approximately 884 kg more than 1980 Lancia Beta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Mountaineer (382 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lancia Beta. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lancia Beta.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia Beta | 2004 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Lancia | Mercury |
Model | Beta | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 1980 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 4604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 239 HP |
Torque | 134 Nm | 382 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.4:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1036 kg | 1920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2920 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 85 L |