1980 Lancia Delta vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1980 Lancia Delta. (85 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1980 Lancia Delta.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 96 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lancia Delta. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2012 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lancia Delta.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia Delta | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Delta | Matrix |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 85 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |