1980 Lancia Delta vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lancia Delta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lancia Delta would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (199 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1980 Lancia Delta. (106 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1980 Lancia Delta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 528 kg more than 1980 Lancia Delta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Lancia Delta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (258 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Lancia Delta. (136 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Lancia Delta. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1980 Lancia Delta has manual transmission. 1980 Lancia Delta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia Delta | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Lancia | Cadillac |
Model | Delta | ATS |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 199 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 136 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 71.5 mm | 101 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 11.4 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 975 kg | 1503 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3900 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1418 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 61 L |