1980 Lancia Gamma vs. 2012 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2012 Toyota Matrix is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lancia Gamma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lancia Gamma would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lancia Gamma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Matrix (132 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1980 Lancia Gamma. (117 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1980 Lancia Gamma.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lancia Gamma (175 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Toyota Matrix. (173 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1980 Lancia Gamma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lancia Gamma | 2012 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Lancia | Toyota |
Model | Gamma | Matrix |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 117 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 175 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4366 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 50 L |