1980 Land Rover Serie III vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Land Rover Serie III. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Land Rover Serie III would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Land Rover Serie III is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 88 kg more than 1980 Land Rover Serie III.
Because 1980 Land Rover Serie III is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Mazda CX-5. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Land Rover Serie III will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1980 Land Rover Serie III has manual transmission. 1980 Land Rover Serie III will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Land Rover Serie III | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Land Rover | Mazda |
Model | Serie III | CX-5 |
Year Released | 1980 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2286 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3630 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1980 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2240 mm | 2700 mm |