1980 Lincoln Continental vs. 1962 Renault 8
To start off, 1980 Lincoln Continental is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Renault 8 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lincoln Continental (130 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1962 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1962 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1962 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Lincoln Continental | 1962 Renault 8 | |
| Make | Lincoln | Renault |
| Model | Continental | 8 |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4942 cc | 956 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 130 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1500 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2280 mm |
