1980 Lincoln Continental vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1980 Lincoln Continental is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lincoln Continental (130 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 685 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1980 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lincoln Continental | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Lincoln | Triumph |
Model | Continental | 2000 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 313 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 76 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2700 mm |