1980 Lincoln Continental vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lincoln Continental (130 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 985 kg more than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer. (90 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1980 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lincoln Continental | 1982 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
Make | Lincoln | Mitsubishi |
Model | Continental | Lancer |
Year Released | 1980 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1244 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 313 Nm | 90 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2390 mm |