1980 Lincoln Continental vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 550 kg more than 1980 Lincoln Continental.
Because 1980 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Nissan Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1980 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lincoln Continental | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Continental | Livina |
Year Released | 1980 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1855 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2610 mm |