1980 Lincoln Continental vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lincoln Continental (130 HP) has 51 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lincoln Continental should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 1980 Lincoln Continental is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lincoln Continental. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lincoln Continental (313 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 1980 Lincoln Continental will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lincoln Continental | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Lincoln | Nissan |
Model | Continental | Micra |
Year Released | 1980 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4942 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 130 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 313 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5570 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1990 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2449 mm |