1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 1952 Saab 92
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 245 kg more than 1952 Saab 92.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Saab 92, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 1952 Saab 92 | |
Make | Lotus | Saab |
Model | Eclat | 92 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1952 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 24 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2480 mm |