1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 1955 Oldsmobile 98
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Oldsmobile 98. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Oldsmobile 98 would be higher. At 5,320 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Oldsmobile 98 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Oldsmobile 98 weights approximately 678 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 1955 Oldsmobile 98 | |
Make | Lotus | Oldsmobile |
Model | Eclat | 98 |
Year Released | 1980 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 5320 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1728 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3210 mm |