1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 1974 Mini Clubman
To start off, 1980 Lotus Eclat is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mini Clubman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mini Clubman would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lotus Eclat weights approximately 400 kg more than 1974 Mini Clubman.
Because 1980 Lotus Eclat is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Lotus Eclat. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Mini Clubman, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 1974 Mini Clubman | |
Make | Lotus | Mini |
Model | Eclat | Clubman |
Year Released | 1980 | 1974 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2140 mm |