1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 1997 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1997 Honda CR-V is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Honda CR-V weights approximately 450 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Because 1997 Honda CR-V is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Lotus Eclat. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda CR-V will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1980 Lotus Eclat | 1997 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Lotus | Honda |
| Model | Eclat | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1980 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 128 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2620 mm |
