1980 Lotus Eclat vs. 2003 MG TF
To start off, 2003 MG TF is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Lotus Eclat. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Lotus Eclat would be higher. At 1,971 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lotus Eclat is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MG TF weights approximately 150 kg more than 1980 Lotus Eclat.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1980 Lotus Eclat | 2003 MG TF | |
Make | Lotus | MG |
Model | Eclat | TF |
Year Released | 1980 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Roadster |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1200 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1210 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2380 mm |